Okay, I’ll admit it – I’m a sucker for stories about hot 18th Century Scottish men named Jamie. Pulled me in for seven books in Diana Gabaldon’s Outlander series. Most recently, I was spun into the Gaelic vortex by Blindspot (Spiegal & Grau, ISBN 978-0-385-52620-3, $15.00, Paperback Release, 12/29/09). Co-written by two Cambridge, MA historians, Jane Kamensky and Jill Lepore, Blindspot weaves the tale of portrait-painter Stewart “Jamie” Jameson, who, fleeing his debtors in Edinburgh, sails to pre-Revolutionary Boston, with not much more than his brushes and a florid gift of gab (Nimrod’s ghost in the Tower of Babel! Judas Iscariot on a flaming red chariot!). Answering Jamie’s advertisement for an apprentice is a starving lad named Francis Weston, who is actually Fanny Easton, a young fallen woman driven from her Brahmin father’s home. Astounded by the quality of Weston’s portfolio, Jamie takes “him” on, and while the boy hones his craft, while he mixes the paints and fills in the backgrounds of the portraits, Jamie steadily and bawdily falls head-over-lusty-heels in love with him. But…but…
Halt, Jameson! You command. What happened to your pledge, uttered not so many pages ago? Leave the boy be!
‘Tis true. He addresses the camera, so to speak. Telling us, the Dear Reader, that he put my hands on his narrow hips–dear God, my hands reached two-thirds of the way around him. I let my thumb stray across that patch of skin, tugging his shirt out of his trousers as I moved my fingers across his back.
Gaa! I am drawn in – absolutely transfixed, his ardor, his passion for the scent, the feel, the innocence of this young lad, and I can’t stop looking, even when he tells me–
Virtuous Reader, judge me as you will, but if you would censor me, now is the hour for you to leave my painting room. Go, but hurry, Sir. I cannot wait. And shut the door behind you.
I am appalled. At myself, at my voyeurism, and yet…
I pressed myself against him, closed my eyes, bent my head, and kissed the downy nape of his neck. His buckled hair, grown soft since he first came to my door–as shorn as a sheep in spring–is not yet long enough to tie. Its loose curls brushed against my face. I kissed his neck, my lips against the soft down. Again and again I kissed him, for he seemed to melt into my embrace. And no, dear Reader, not as a child nests against a parent, but knowingly, full conscious of the pleasures his body might give, and take; full sensible–how could he not be?–of the force of my ardor.
Oy! I’m reveling in this, a party to the crime of this boy’s violation! And yet, I’m not, because I’m in on the joke, fully aware that the he is a she, that the lad is a lass, that the boy is a woman, and not only allowing the attention but inviting it, reveling in it, falling in love with Jamie as well, even as he is attempting to slake his burgeoning- now wait a minute!
See? This is the quandary I faced, as I read a little over half the book before Fanny’s secret was revealed. Admittedly, there were parts that were a bit hard to swallow, such as the mystery surrounding a certain crime and its subsequently pat resolution, and there was a slight problem with historic continuity. But overall, the interaction of the two principles, the bawdy language and the romance, made for a rollicking good time. And upon finishing, I honestly hoped for a sequel (still do). Yet I couldn’t help thinking: where do we draw the line between what we’re willing to accept as art, and what violates our innate code of conduct, ie, Young Boys Are a No-No, Fictional or Otherwise? Does it come down to another variation on Willing Suspension of…? I’m not sure. But I did breathe a sigh of relief when Fanny literally and figuratively dropped her drawers.
Many tentative smooches -
Trudy